The Réunion paradox and the digenic model.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clan genomics: From OMIM phenotypic traits to genes and biology.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2021
   Article
2. Gene panel sequencing identifies a likely monogenic cause in 7% of 235 Pakistani families with nephrolithiasis.Human genetics · 2019
   Article
3. Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Causative Mutations in Families with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2018
   Article
4. Epidemiological and Molecular Characterization of a Mexican Population Isolate with High Prevalence of Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 2A Due to a Novel Calpain-3 Mutation.PloS one · 2017
   Article
5. The tumor-necrosis-factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome: new mutations in TNFRSF1A, ancestral origins, genotype-phenotype studies, and evidence for further genetic heterogeneity of periodic fevers.American journal of human genetics · 2001
   Article
6. Structure of the SLC7A7 gene and mutational analysis of patients affected by lysinuric protein intolerance.American journal of human genetics · 2000
   Article
7. DNA studies of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2A in the Amish exclude a modifying mitochondrial gene and show no evidence for a modifying nuclear gene.American journal of human genetics · 1997
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Multiple mutations in a specific gene in a small geographic area: a common phenomenon?1996

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as