Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8937719›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996

Plasticity of contractile endothelin-B receptors in human arteries after organ culture.

M Adner, L Cantera, F Ehlert, L Nilsson, L Edvinsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M AdnerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.
L Cantera
F Ehlert
L Nilsson
L Edvinsson
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The pharmacology and mRNA expression of endothelin (ET) receptors in human omental arteries were characterized by use of functional contractile assays and the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). 2. In freshly obtained segments of human omental arteries, ET-1 and ET-3 induced concentration-dependent contractions which were normalized to the response produced by 60 mM K+. ET-1 produced a maximum contraction (Emax) amounting to 151 +/- 17% of the K+ response. The pEC50 for this agonist was 8.64 +/- 0.17. The effect of ET-3 was less pronounced (Emax: 71 +/- 22% and pEC50: 6.69 +/- 0.17) than that of ET-1. The ET receptors involved were characterized with FR139317 (a selective ETA receptor antagonist), PD 145065 (a mixed ETA and ETB receptor antagonist) and BQ 788 (an ETB receptor antagonist). A high concentration of these antagonists (10 microM) abolished the contractile responses to ET-3, and produced a parallel rightward shift of the ET-1 concentration-response curve without changing the maximal effect. FR139317 and PD 145065 were equally effective while BQ 788 was much less effective. This is consistent with ETA receptors mediating contraction in human omental arteries. 3. Arterial segments cultured for 5 days in serum-free Dulbecco's medium at 37 degrees C under sterile and humidified conditions retained contractility although responses to 60 mM K+ were somewhat reduced. ET-3 was significantly more potent in the cultured arteries (pEC50: 8.56 +/- 0.15) and achieved a greater maximum effect (Emax: 116 +/- 19%). Responses were not antagonised by FR139317 but were competitively blocked by PD 145065 and BQ 788 with the latter antagonist being the more potent. In contrast Emax (179 +/- 17%) and pEC50 (8.66 +/- 0.23) values for ET-1 were not significantly different from those obtained with fresh arteries. PD 145065 still demonstrated a rightward shift of the ET-1-induced concentration-response curve, whereas FR139317 and BQ 788 caused non-significant shifts. These findings suggest that functional ETB receptors contribute significantly to the endothelin contractile response in cultured arteries. 4. Two-site analysis of the ET-1 induced concentration-response curve from cultured arteries suggests that ETB receptors, at the high potency component, and ETA receptors, at the low potency component, contribute both to the contractile response in relative proportion of 70% and 30%, respectively. Further analysis suggested that the ETA receptor would be capable of evoking at least 75% of the ET-1 contraction in the absence of ETB receptors, although with a lower potency as compared to fresh arteries. 5. Electrophoresis of RT-PCR products from the smooth muscle layer of freshly obtained human arteries indicated the presence of mRNA for both ETA and ETB receptors. Arteries cultured for 1 and 5 days demonstrated an increase of mRNA for the ETB receptor as compared to the ETA receptor. The identities of the PCR products were verified by restriction enzyme digestion. 6. In freshly obtained human omental arteries, the contractile effects of endothelins appear to be mediated predominantly by the ETA receptor subtype, with a negligible contribution by ETB receptors. Cultured arterial segments, however, exhibited a substantial ETB receptor mediated contractile response and an increase in ETB receptor mRNA content, consistent with an upregulation of functional ETB receptors. These in vitro data suggest plasticity in the smooth muscle cell expression of contractile ETB receptors.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityVasoconstrictionArteriesAzepinesDNA, ComplementaryEndothelinsHumansIndolesOrgan Culture TechniquesReceptor, Endothelin AReceptor, Endothelin BReceptors, EndothelinAzepinesDNA, ComplementaryEndothelinsFR 139317IndolesReceptor, Endothelin AReceptor, Endothelin BReceptors, Endothelin

Identifiers

PMID8937719
PMCPMC1915908
OpenAlexW2029796239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.