ArticleLipids1996
Effect of sample storage on quantitation of lipoprotein(a) by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Article in Lipids, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women (Healthy Women Study)
Epidemiology of Carotid Disease in Elderly Adults
Genetic Epidemiology of CHD Risk Factors in Blacks
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of storage on the quantitation of lipoprotein (Lp)(a) in 25 serum samples. Aliquots of serum were stored for up to three years at either -20 degrees C or -70 degrees C and Lp(a) subsequently analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Concentrations of Lp(a) declined during storage, and the temperatures employed elicited significantly different (P < 0.05) values within 12 mon which further diverged during three years of storage. Compared to baseline values, significant decreases (P < 0.05) in Lp(a) levels were evident after six months of storage at -20 degrees C with apparent losses (geometric mean) reaching 36.9% (95% confidence interval: 30.9%, 42.9%) after three years. Similarly, significantly lower (P < 0.05) Lp(a) values were recorded after six months of storage at -70 degrees C and at three years the decrease (geometric mean) was 19.1% (95% confidence interval: 14.3%, 24.0%). The losses, after three years, in terms of the arithmetic mean were 53.5 and 26.2% at -20 and -70 degrees C, respectively. Phenotype analysis suggested that large isoforms are more susceptible to degradation than smaller moieties. This may be related to the observation that apparent losses are reduced in samples containing over 8 mg/dL Lp(a). Nevertheless, Lp(a) levels in stored samples retained a strong correlation with the baseline values. These results must be considered specific for the storage conditions and analytical procedures employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.