Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8932448›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research1996

Formulation and antitumor activity evaluation of nanocrystalline suspensions of poorly soluble anticancer drugs.

E Merisko-Liversidge, P Sarpotdar, J Bruno, S Hajj, L Wei, N Peltier, J Rake, J M Shaw, S Pugh, L Polin and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lignin from Micro- to Nanosize: Production Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E Merisko-LiversidgeNanoSystems, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA.
P Sarpotdar
J Bruno
S Hajj
L Wei
N Peltier
J Rake
J M Shaw
S Pugh
L Polin
J Jones
T Corbett
E Cooper
G G Liversidge
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetermine if wet milling technology could be used to formulate water insoluble antitumor agents as stabilized nanocrystalline drug suspensions that retain biological effectiveness following intravenous injection.

methodsThe versatility of the approach is demonstrated by evaluation of four poorly water soluble chemotherapeutic agents that exhibit diverse chemistries and mechanisms of action. The compounds selected were: piposulfan (alkylating agent), etoposide (topoisomerase II inhibitor), camptothecin (topoisomerase I inhibitor) and paclitaxel (antimitotic agent). The agents were wet milled as a 2% w/v solids suspension containing 1% w/v surfactant stabilizer using a low energy ball mill. The size, physical stability and efficacy of the nanocrystalline suspensions were evaluated.

resultsThe data show the feasibility of formulating poorly water soluble anticancer agents as physically stable aqueous nanocrystalline suspensions. The suspensions are physically stable and efficacious following intravenous injection.

conclusionsWet milling technology is a feasible approach for formulating poorly water soluble chemotherapeutic agents that may offer a number of advantages over a more classical approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PharmaceuticalChemistry, PhysicalCrystallizationDrug Delivery SystemsDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleMammary Neoplasms, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C3HParticle SizeSolubilitySuspensionsAntineoplastic AgentsSuspensions

Identifiers

PMID8932448
OpenAlexW126259857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.