Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8931216›Full record

ArticleSurgery today1996

Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17 in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Y Tagawa, T Sawai, T Nakagoe, M Morinaga, T Yasutake, H Ayabe, M Tomita

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Y TagawaFirst Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan.
T Sawai
T Nakagoe
M Morinaga
T Yasutake
H Ayabe
M Tomita

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is an easy and efficient means of measuring numerical chromosome aberrations in the interphase nuclei of solid tumors; however, the correlation between numerical chromosome aberrations and the clinical stage of solid tumors remains unknown. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the relationship between numerical chromosome aberrations and clinicopathologic features in colorectal adenocarcinomas. FISH was applied to surgically resected colorectal cancer samples from 45 patients to evaluate the numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17. The mean age of the patients was 65.1 years, and they comprised 13 women and 32 men. According to Dukes' classification, 5 patients were categorized as stage A, 21 as stage B, 10 as stage C, and 9 as stage D. Histologically, 18 of the samples were lymph node metastasis-positive. FISH revealed numerical aberrations of chromosome 11 in 27 out of the 45 patients (60%), and those with a lower chromosome 11 number had a significantly lower incidence of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Chromosome 17 proved to have numerical abnormalities in 33 of the 45 patients (73%), and those with a higher chromosome 17 number had more DNA aneuploidy (P < 0.005). This is the first report to reveal the relationship between monosomy 11 and lymph node metastasis in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsChromosomes, Human, Pair 11Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAneuploidyColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID8931216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.