ArticleInfection and immunity1996
Gastrointestinal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in immunosuppressed mice.
Article in Infection and immunity, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus non-aureus infection in an irradiated rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta).Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ICR mice were inoculated intranasally with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) N133, and the inoculated MRSA was quantitatively recovered from the ceca and feces. The viable counts of the MRSA recovered from ceca correlated well with those from feces. Some mice eliminated MRSA from the cecum by 14 days after inoculation. Intraperitoneal administration of cyclophosphamide at a dose of 200 mg/kg 3 days before inoculation inhibited the elimination of the MRSA from both ceca and feces. All mice treated with cyclophosphamide excreted more than 10(4) CFU of the MRSA per g of feces for at least 70 days, indicating persistent colonization of the MRSA in the gastrointestinal tract. Some beta-lactam antibiotics decreased the colonization level, but others did not. The colonization level was suggested to depend on the antibacterial activity of the antibiotic against the MRSA and the degree of disturbance of intestinal flora by the antibiotic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.