Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8919880›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1996

Relationships between bacterial drug resistance pumps and other transport proteins.

J H Parish, J Bentley

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J H ParishDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
J Bentley

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have used three reference sequences representative of bacterial drug resistance pumps and sugar transport proteins to collect the 91 most closely related sequences from a composite, nonredundant protein sequence database. Having eliminated certain very close relatives, the remainder were subjected to analysis and alignment by using two different similarity matrices: one of these was a matrix based on structural conservation of amino acid residues in proteins of known conformation and the other was based on the more familiar mutational matrix. Unrooted similarity trees for these proteins were constructed for each matrix and compared. A systematic analysis of the differences between these trees was undertaken and the sequences were analyzed for the presence or absence of certain sequence motifs. The results show that the clades created by the two methods are broadly comparable but that there are some clusters of sequences that are significantly different. Further analysis confirmed that (1) the sequences collected by this objective method are all known or putative 12-helix (in some cases reported as 14-helix) transmembrane proteins, (2) there is evidence for few cases of an origin based on gene duplication, (3) the bacterial drug resistance pumps are distributed in more than one clade and cannot be regarded as a definitive subset of these proteins, and that (4) the diversity is such that there is no evidence of a single ancestral protein. The possible extension of the methods to other cases of divergent protein sequences is discussed.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsCarrier ProteinsDatabases, FactualDrug Resistance, MicrobialEvolution, MolecularHumansMolecular Sequence DataSequence Homology, Amino AcidBacterial ProteinsCarrier Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8919880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.