ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1996
General practitioners and clinical guidelines: a survey of knowledge, use and beliefs.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconsidering low-dose aspirin therapy for cardiovascular disease: a study protocol for physician and patient behavioral change.Implementation science : IS · 2011Trial
- Knowledge on Irradiation, Medical Imaging Prescriptions, and Clinical Imaging Referral Guidelines among Physicians in a Sub-Saharan African Country (Cameroon).Radiology research and practice · 2017Article
- Clinicians' justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role?Insights into imaging · 2010Article
- Family physicians' perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control.BMC family practice · 2004Article
- Legal and political considerations of clinical practice guidelines.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999Article
- General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1999Article
- What are hospitals doing about clinical guidelines?Quality in health care : QHC · 1997Article
- Clinical guidelines: quantity without quality.Quality in health care : QHC · 1997Article
- A prospective study assessing clinicians attitude and knowledge on radiation exposure to patients during radiological investigations.Journal of natural science, biology, and medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical practice guidelines are being developed for a variety of reasons. To date, there has been little investigation of the perspectives of those who are recommended to use them.
aimThe survey reported here set out to investigate how familiar general practitioners are with a range of published guidelines, to assess whether they have used them, and to describe their attitudes to the guidelines and the methods of implementing them.
methodA postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 559 general practitioners in the North and Yorkshire region in March 1995. Questions were organized around the topics of: knowledge; use; practice change; beliefs; pressure felt to use the guidelines; and methods of implementation. Basic classificatory data on gender; year of qualification; partnership and fundholding status were also collected.
resultsReplies were received from 300 doctors (54%). Knowledge and use of the three selected guidelines varied, but was generally towards the 'high' end of the scale. Doctors showed a high degree of homogeneity in their attitudes to guidelines, which were generally positive. Only single-handed practitioners varied from this pattern of responses. Most of the pressure to use the guidelines was felt to come from the Department of Health, and the least pressure from patients. Doctors felt that the methods of implementation that involved them in educational events and discussion with colleagues were most likely to have an impact on them.
conclusionGeneral practitioners are receptive to guideline initiatives, and their views are in line with existing or proposed implementation strategies. More investigation of the concept of 'use' is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8917869PMC1239745What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.