Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8916746›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

New antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of their efficacy and tolerability.

A G Marson, Z A Kadir, D W Chadwick

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vigabatrin add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Zonisamide add-on therapy for focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Zonisamide add-on therapy for focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Tiagabine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Tiagabine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Topiramate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  11. Tiagabine add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Pregabalin in the management of partial epilepsy.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2009
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The promise of new antiepileptic drugs.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A G MarsonDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Liverpool. marjon01@liv.ac.uk
Z A Kadir
D W Chadwick
Walton Centre · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the newly developed antiepileptic drugs gabapentin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

designSystematic review of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials of add-on treatment with new antiepileptic drugs. SUBJECTS: 20 published and eight unpublished trials representing 3883 patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

main outcome measuresProportion of patients who (a) showed 50% or greater reduction in frequency of seizures (50% responders) and (b) withdrew from each study for any reason.

resultsOdds ratios (95% confidence intervals) relative to placebo for 50% responders were 2.29 (1.53 to 3.43) for gabapentin, 2.32 (1.47 to 3.68) for lamotrigine, 3.03 (2.01 to 4.58) for tiagabine, 4.22 (2.80 to 6.35) for topiramate, 3.68 (2.45 to 5.51) for vigabatrin, and 2.47 (1.36 to 4.47) for zonisamide. Odds ratios for withdrawal were 1.36 (0.75 to 2.49) for gabapentin, 1.19 (0.79 to 1.79) for lamotrigine, 1.81 (1.21 to 2.70) for tiagabine, 2.42 (1.43 to 4.11) for topiramate, 2.58 (1.26 to 5.27) for vigabatrin, and 5.70 (1.76 to 18.49) for zonisamide. Comparing results for each drug showed that all of the 95% confidence intervals overlapped, indicating that they were not significantly different in terms of efficacy and tolerability.

conclusionsAll six drugs were significantly better than placebo at reducing frequency of seizures. These results do not allow an evidence based choice between these drugs as we have no conclusive indication of differences in efficacy or tolerability.

Indexed as

AminesCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsAcetatesAdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsChildCross-Over StudiesEpilepsyFemaleFructoseGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidHumansIsoxazolesAcetatesAminesAnticonvulsantsCyclohexanecarboxylic AcidsFructoseGabapentingamma-Aminobutyric AcidIsoxazolesLamotrigineNipecotic AcidsTiagabineTopiramateTriazinesVigabatrinZonisamide

Identifiers

PMID8916746
PMCPMC2352473
OpenAlexW1975482049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.