Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8910222›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology1996

Calcium currents, transmitter release and facilitation of release at voltage-clamped crayfish nerve terminals.

S N Wright, M S Brodwick, G D Bittner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative relationship between transmitter release and calcium current at the calyx of held synapse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2001
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Relief of G-protein inhibition of calcium channels and short-term synaptic facilitation in cultured hippocampal neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2000
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuromodulators enhance transmitter release by two separate mechanisms at the inhibitor of crayfish opener muscle.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1998
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S N WrightDepartment of Zoology, University of Texas, Austin 78712, USA.
M S Brodwick
G D Bittner

Funding

TRANSIENT EVOKED POTENTIALSR01NS024282 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THAKOR, NITISH VYOMESH · 1986 to 2003
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS NS 24282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The presynaptic terminals at crayfish (Procambarus spp.) opener neuromuscular junctions were voltage clamped. Calcium currents were measured during (ICa) and following (tail ICa) presynaptic depolarizations; EPSPs or IPSPs were simultaneously recorded from the (postsynaptic) muscle fibre directly beneath the presynaptic impalement. 2. For short (< or = 6 ms) presynaptic depolarizations, most of the transmitter release occurred during the tail ICa. EPSP or IPSP amplitudes at the end of the 6 ms pulse (end EPSP or end IPSP) increased monotonically with the integral of the ICa ([symbol: see text]ICa). The suppression potential for transmitter release was near the apparent reversal potential for ICa. 3. When the end EPSP or end IPSP amplitude was plotted against the peak ICa elicited during a presynaptic pulse (peak ICa), large and small depolarizations which evoked the same peak ICa evoked different amounts of transmitter release. The differences in transmitter release were eliminated when end EPSP amplitude was plotted against [symbol: see text] ICa, suggesting that transmitter release during a depolarization depends only upon calcium current and not upon a subsequent voltage-dependent step. 4. The synaptic transfer function of various measurements of EPSP or IPSP amplitude vs. [symbol: see text]ICa evoked during a presynaptic depolarization was a power function having an exponent of about 3. Similar measurements of EPSP amplitude vs. [symbol: see text]tail ICa evoked following a presynaptic depolarization had an exponent of about 2. 5. Facilitation of an EPSP or IPSP was not due to increases in calcium current at the test depolarization. 6. When the conditioning depolarization was increased and the test depolarization remained constant, EPSP amplitude at the test depolarization and facilitation increased . When the conditioning depolarization remained constant and the test depolarization was increased, EPSP amplitude at the test depolarization increased, while facilitation decreased. 7. Our data suggested that transmitter release at crayfish neuromuscular junctions is a non-linear function of calcium influx, and that facilitated release utilizes intracellular calcium differently from non-facilitated release. These data contradict simple models of facilitation which combine the residual calcium hypothesis with the calcium co-operativity hypothesis of non-facilitated release.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstacoideaCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsElectric StimulationElectrophysiologyIn Vitro TechniquesMembrane PotentialsNerve EndingsNeurotransmitter AgentsPatch-Clamp TechniquesReceptors, PresynapticCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium ChannelsNeurotransmitter AgentsReceptors, Presynaptic

Identifiers

PMID8910222
PMCPMC1160883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.