Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8908411›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience1996

A search for association between schizophrenia and dopamine-related alleles.

E Jönsson, S Brené, T Geijer, L Terenius, A Tylec, M L Persson, G Sedvall

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A meta-analysis of data associatingNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2018
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The dopamine D4 receptor: biochemical and signalling properties.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E JönssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
S Brené
T Geijer
L Terenius
A Tylec
M L Persson
G Sedvall

Funding

PET ANALYSIS OF D1 DOPAMINE RECEPTORS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH044814 · NIMH · KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE · PI SEDVALL, GORAN G · 1997 to 2001
$328k
PET ANALYSIS OF FL-DOPAMINE RECEPTORS IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR37MH044814 · NIMH · KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE · PI SEDVALL, GORAN G · 1989 to 1996
–
NIMH NIH HHS MH 44814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine receptor dysfunction and altered tyrosine hydroxylase activity have both been implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Schizophrenic patients and control subjects were examined for allele frequencies in the tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine D2 and D4 receptor genes. No significant differences of allele or genotype frequencies were found between the two groups after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Neither were any significant relationships observed between allele frequencies and a number of clinical variables within the schizophrenic subsample. When no adjustment was made for multiple testing a few significant tendencies were obtained which warrant further research in extended patient and control materials. The results are compatible with the view that the tyrosine hydroxylase, dopamine receptor D2 and D4 gene polymorphisms examined are not of major importance in the aetiology or pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Indexed as

AllelesAdultAgedBrainFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, Dopamine D2SchizophreniaTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseReceptors, Dopamine D2Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase

Identifiers

PMID8908411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.