ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology1996
Susceptibility testing of fungi: current status of correlation of in vitro data with clinical outcome.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update on the Pathogenesis, Virulence, and Treatment ofPathogens & immunity · 2022Review
- Equine Pulmonary Cryptococcosis: A Comparative Literature Review and Evaluation of Fluconazole Monotherapy.Mycopathologia · 2017Review
- Article
- Early presumptive therapy with fluconazole for occult Candida infection after gastrointestinal surgery.World journal of surgery · 2006Article
- Testing of the in vitro susceptibilities of Madurella mycetomatis to six antifungal agents by using the Sensititre system in comparison with a viability-based 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5- [(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) assay and a modified NCCLS method.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2005Article
- Use of turbidimetric growth curves for early determination of antifungal drug resistance of filamentous fungi.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Detection of fluconazole-resistant isolates of Candida glabrata by using an agar screen assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Mechanisms of fungal resistance: an overview.Drugs · 2002Review
- Antifungal susceptibility testing: practical aspects and current challenges.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2001Review
- Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001Article
- Antifungal susceptibility testing of fluconazole by flow cytometry correlates with clinical outcome.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2001Article
- Sensitive bioassay for determination of fluconazole concentrations in plasma using a Candida albicans mutant hypersusceptible to azoles.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001Article
- Comparative evaluation of PASCO and national committee for clinical laboratory standards M27-A broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of yeasts.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
- Correlation of fluconazole MICs with clinical outcome in cryptococcal infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Evaluation of a capacitance method for direct antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts in positive blood cultures.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
- Bloodstream infections due to Candida species: SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program in North America and Latin America, 1997-1998.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Trends in antifungal susceptibility among Candida sp. Urinary isolates from 1994 and 1998.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000Article
- Activation of the multiple drug resistance gene MDR1 in fluconazole-resistant, clinical Candida albicans strains is caused by mutations in a trans-regulatory factor.Journal of bacteriology · 2000Article
- Characterization and quantitation of the pharmacodynamics of fluconazole in a neutropenic murine disseminated candidiasis infection model.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1999Article
- Candida glabrata: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and clinical disease with comparison to C. albicans.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1999Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In summary, it is clear that in vitro susceptibility testing can predict outcome in selected clinical situations. The clearest data are from the fluconazole-treated AIDS patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. In this setting, the homogeneity of the underlying immune defect, combined with the ease of identification and monitoring of the infection, creates a near-perfect test situation. In more complex scenarios, such as the heterogeneous population of patients enrolled in a recent study of candidemia, no such clear-cut correlation was present. The importance of host factors in the correlation of the MIC with outcome cannot be overemphasized. Examples of these parameters include patient status (underlying disease, the presence of intravascular catheters, and CD4+ T-cell number), drug pharmacokinetics (absorption and distribution), patient compliance, and drug-drug interactions. Identification of relevant factors can substantially improve the degree of the MIC-outcome correlation and thus improve the clinical utility of in vitro testing. An important feature in this entire process is the role of standardized susceptibility testing procedures. While not without flaws, the proposed NCCLS reference method has been invaluable in allowing multiple investigators to contribute data that can be used to clarify the correlation between the fluconazole MIC and outcome. While the development of simplified second-generation methods is eagerly anticipated, the role of the reference method as a common touchstone is critical. Only by use of either the reference method itself or methods with a known relationship to the reference method can this broad collaborative process really proceed. Current work is focusing on defining interpretive breakpoints for fluconazole and Candida species, refinement of the in vitro procedures used to measure susceptibility to amphotericin B, ketoconazole, and itraconazole, and the acquisition of a broad base of data on the relationship between the MIC and outcome for these three drugs. Although considerable work remains to be done, the available data suggest that solutions to each of these problems are possible and that routine susceptibility testing of fungi will become meaningful for clinical decision making in the foreseeable future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.