Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8903730›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society1996

Genetic composition of the recombinant congenic strains.

A P Stassen, P C Groot, J T Eppig, P Demant

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A P StassenDivision of Molecular Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam.
P C Groot
J T Eppig
P Demant
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLJackson Laboratory · USOncode Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the study of biological phenomena influenced by multiple genes in mice, the Recombinant Congenic Strains (RCS) have been developed. An RCS series comprises approximately 20 homozygous strains, each of which contains on average 87.5% genes of a common background strain and 12.5% of a common donor strain. In an RCS series, non-linked genes involved in the control of a multigenic trait become distributed into different recombinant congenic strains. In this way a multigenic trait is transformed into a series of single gene traits in which each gene can be studied individually. For the ability to use the strength of the recombinant congenic strains system to its full extent, a thorough genetic characterization is indispensable. We have typed the CcS/Dem and OcB/Dem series for 611 and 550 markers, respectively. This results in a genetic characterization sufficient to detect most donor strain genes. In addition, we report the genetic characterization of the HcB/Dem and HcB(N4)/Dem series. Strains of the latter series contain on average 6.25% of the donor strain genome. Both series have been typed for 130 markers. All the typing data have been deposited in the Mouse Genome Database at The Jackson Laboratory.

Indexed as

GenesAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomesCrosses, GeneticDatabases, FactualGenetic MarkersHomozygoteMiceMice, Inbred StrainsRecombination, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID8903730
OpenAlexW1978332091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.