Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8902391›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology1996

The new vaccines: building viruses that elicit antitumor immunity.

N P Restifo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Immunochemical termination of self-tolerance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Cancer vaccines: progress reveals new complexities.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2002
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N P RestifoSurgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. restifo@helix.nih.gov
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZ01BC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI RESTIFO, NICHOLAS P · 2006 to 2008
$6.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010763Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whereas cancer cells are poor immunogens, some viruses are capable of eliciting powerful and lifelong immunity. Recombinant viruses and plasmid DNA encoding tumor-associated antigens can elicit powerful and specific immune responses that can be enhanced by the use of cytokines and costimulatory molecules. These immune responses have destroyed growing tumor cells in experimental animal models. For the first time, immunotherapeutic strategies that employ recombinant viruses are being tested in clinical trials with cancer patients.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesDisease Models, AnimalGenetic VectorsHumansImmune ToleranceImmunotherapyMiceNeoplasms, ExperimentalVirusesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntigens, NeoplasmCancer Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID8902391
PMCPMC1950785
OpenAlexW2064535316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.