ArticleGenetica1996
Enrichment of middle repetitive element Bm-1 transcripts in translationally active RNA fractions of the silkmoth, Bombyx mori.
Article in Genetica, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel non-autonomous transposable elements on W chromosome of the silkworm, Bombyx mori.Journal of genetics · 2010Article
- Stress induction of Bm1 RNA in silkworm larvae: SINEs, an unusual class of stress genes.Cell stress & chaperones · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Bm-1 repetitive element family represents a group of transcribed repetitive sequences in the genome of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. In the Bm-5 and BmN permanent cell lines studied here, alpha-amanitin inhibition and nuclear 'run-on' experiments demonstrated that approximately 80% of the Bm-1 transcripts are produced by RNA polymerase II. Bm-1 transcripts are dramatically enriched in poly A+ and polysomal RNA fractions compared to total RNA in these two cell lines. In the Bm-5 cell line, from total to poly A+ and polysomal RNA fractions, Bm-1 transcripts are enriched approximately 4 and 2 times, respectively, while in the BmN cell line these same fractions are enriched about 2 and 19 times compared to total RNA. This suggests that the Bm-1 transcripts may be involved in post-transcriptional processes or control of translation. Our data also revealed less size heterogeneity of Bm-1 transcripts in polysomal as compared to nuclear fractions. In the Bm-5 and BmN cell lines, the size of most transcripts containing Bm-1 sequences increases from approximately 1700 nt in the nucleus to 3000 nt in the polysomal fraction, both fractions with RNA much larger than the Bm-1 consensus sequence (250 bp). This raises the possibility that some Bm-1 elements are transcribed as part of larger transcripts containing mRNA by way of 'read-through', and may be involved in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression as cis and/or trans acting elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.