Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8898599›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)1996

Determining the size of a total purchasing site to manage the financial risks of rare costly referrals: computer simulation model.

M O Bachmann, G Bevan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Is bigger better for primary care groups and trusts?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Review
  3. Setting budgets for general practice in the new NHS.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1999
    Article
  4. Evaluating primary care groups.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M O BachmannDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol.
G Bevan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the financial risks of 15 categories of rare costly referrals for total purchasing sites of different population sizes.

designComputer simulation of 100 fund years assuming Poisson distribution of referrals.

settingBritish general practices that have opted to become total purchasing sites. Referral rates and price estimates were supplied by South and West Devon Health Commission.

main outcome measuresVariation in referral costs to purchasers in relation to size of risk pool (person years at risk).

resultsRandom variation in referral costs increased as the size of the risk pool decreased. Variation increased greatly below 30,000 person years. The mean simulated cost of the referral categories considered was 2.8% of total NHS hospital and community service costs, and the maximum simulated cost for 7000 person years was 6.8%. Simulated variation was robust to assumption about prices and referral rates for specific types of referral.

conclusionRare costly referrals seem unlikely to bankrupt total purchasing sites. The management of risk is not in itself justification for total purchasing to be based in several general practices in order to generate large populations. There are other ways of managing risk. Sites can easily explore options by simulations using local referral rates and prices.

Indexed as

Financial ManagementComputer SimulationFamily PracticeHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHumansReferral and ConsultationRisk AssessmentState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID8898599
PMCPMC2352382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.