Specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by mtp40 nested PCR.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Clinical, radiological and molecular diagnosis correlation in serum samples from patients with osteoarticular tuberculosis.Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine · 2014
   Article
2. Genotype of a historic strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
   Article
3. Evaluation of PCR in detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues: comparison of four amplification assays.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1998
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Evaluation of mtp40 genomic fragment amplification for specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens.1996

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as