Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8897173›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR with primers Hp1 and Hp2 for detection of Helicobacter pylori.

S K Chong, Q Lou, J F Fitzgerald, C H Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Milk of livestock as a possible transmission route of Helicobacter pylori infection.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Helicobacter pylori.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1997
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S K ChongDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202, USA. schong@indyvax.iupui.edu
Q Lou
J F Fitzgerald
C H Lee
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PCR primer set Hp1-Hp2, which amplifies a 109-bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene of Helicobacter pylori, has been widely used for the detection of H. pylori in clinical specimens. We have examined 34 stool samples and 50 human tissue samples from H. pylori-infected and uninfected patients, five human leukocyte samples, and one human cell line by this PCR method. All of these specimens produced a 109-bp PCR product. When Escherichia coli DNA was used as the template, several nonspecific bands, but not the 109-bp band, were observed. No PCR products were generated when DNA samples from five different fungi were used as templates. These results indicate that this 109-bp PCR product was amplified from the human genome. The 109-bp PCR product generated from various clinical specimens also hybridized with the probe pHp, corresponding to a region internal to the PCR product of Hp1-Hp2. We conclude that the 16S rRNA gene PCR with the primer set Hp1-Hp2 is not specific and cannot be used to detect H. pylori in clinical specimens.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialBacteriological TechniquesBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID8897173
PMCPMC229394
OpenAlexW1604842473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.