Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8896945›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1996

Clinical pharmacokinetics during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

C A Taylor, E Abdel-Rahman, S W Zimmerman, C A Johnson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C A TaylorSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA.
E Abdel-Rahman
S W Zimmerman
C A Johnson
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has gained recognition worldwide as an alternative to haemodialysis in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease. Because the peritoneal catheter provides direct access to the peritoneum, intraperitoneal drug administration has become widely used for the administration of certain drugs. The instillation and drainage of PD fluids contribute to the total body clearance of drugs given by other routes. For most drugs, peritoneal clearance is low. This paper provides an updated review of recently published pharmacokinetic studies involving the administration of selected drugs to patients receiving PD. Antibiotics continue to be extensively studied and administered in PD patients because of the frequent occurrence of infections. Epoetin (recombinant human erythropoietin) has become widely used and is the subject of ongoing pharmacokinetic investigation. Intraperitoneal insulin has become accepted for the treatment of patients with diabetes receiving PD; the pharmacokinetics of vitamin D analogues in PD patients continue to be explored.

Indexed as

Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous AmbulatoryPharmacokineticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveErythropoietinHumansInsulinMetabolic Clearance RateAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythropoietinInsulin

Identifiers

PMID8896945
OpenAlexW2060089863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.