Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8894348›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews1996

Pneumocystis carinii: what is it, exactly?

J R Stringer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Immune responses of different hosts toEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pneumocystosis in a lurcher puppy.Medical mycology case reports · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. In vitro and in vivo activity of iclaprim, a diaminopyrimidine compound and potential therapeutic alternative against Pneumocystis pneumonia.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antiparasitic agent atovaquone.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2002
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J R StringerDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH 45267-0524, USA. stringjr@ucbeh.san.uc.edu

Funding

MOLECULAR GENETIC ANALYSIS OF PNEUMOCYSTISR01AI028471 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI STRINGER, JAMES RICHARD · 1989 to 1991
–
NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI 28932NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 28471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identity of Pneumocystis carinii has been uncertain for many years. Until recently, it was widely regarded to be a protozoan because it does not grow in culture and is not susceptible to antifungal drugs. Although these and a number of other phenotypic characteristics of P. carinii differ from those of typical fungi, analysis of DNA sequences has shown that P. carinii is a member of the fungal lineage of eukaryotes. However, a close phylogenetic relative of P. carinii has not yet been found. Analysis of gene sequences has also revealed that P. carinii is not a single entity but that the genus Pneumocystis contains a complex group of organisms. P. carinii organisms from one host species do not grow when introduced into another host species, and P. carinii isolates from different host species are more genetically divergent from one another than might be expected for members of the same species. Genetic variation of a lesser degree also occurs among P. carinii organisms from the same host species, suggesting that it may be possible to identify strains and to conduct transmission and epidemiological studies. Results of early studies exploiting genetic variation among P. carinii isolates from patients have suggested that recurrent P. carinii pneumonia may not always be caused by reactivation of latent organisms, as is commonly believed. However, other features of P. carinii suggest that this microbe has established a long-term relationship with its host. A striking new development in this regard is the discovery of a genetic system that is designed to allow variation in the structure of a major antigen on the surface of P. carinii.

Indexed as

Antigenic VariationFungal ProteinsGene RearrangementGenetic VariationHost-Parasite InteractionsPneumocystisSpecies SpecificityFungal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID8894348
PMCPMC172906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.