ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Effect of selective blockade of endothelin ETB receptors on the liver dysfunction and injury caused by endotoxaemia in the rat.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current trends in inflammatory and immunomodulatory mediators in sepsis.Journal of leukocyte biology · 2013Review
- The hepatic protective mechanism of Ginkgo biloba extract in rats with obstructive jaundice.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2011Article
- Differentiated effects on splanchnic homeostasis by selective and non-selective endothelin receptor antagonism in porcine endotoxaemia.British journal of pharmacology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. We investigated the effects of the selective endothelin (ET)A receptor antagonist BQ-485 and the selective ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 on circulatory failure, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and the alterations in acid base balance caused by endotoxaemia in the anaesthetized rat. 2. Male Wistar rats were anaesthetized (thiopentone sodium; 120 mg kg-1, i.p.) and received a continuous infusion of vehicle (saline, 0.6 ml kg-1h-1, i.v.), BQ-485 (10 nmol kg-1 min-1, i.v.) or BQ-788 (10 nmol kg-1 min-1, i.v.). Fifteen min later, animals received a bolus injection of either saline (0.9% NaCl, 1 ml kg-1, i.v.) or E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 10 mg kg-1, i.v.). 3. Injection of LPS resulted in a fall in blood pressure from 115 +/- 4 mmHg (time 0) to 82 +/- 4 mmHg at 360 min (n = 15) as well as a hyporeactivity to the pressor responses to noradrenaline (NA, 1 microgram kg-1, i.v.). Infusion of BQ-788 attenuated the delayed hypotension (at 360 min: 100 +/- 4 mmHg, n = 7; P < 0.05) and significantly enhanced the pressor responses elicited by NA (at 60 to 240 min). In contrast, treatment of LPS-rats with BQ-485 augmented the hypotension (at 360 min), but did not affect the vascular hyporeactivity elicited by endotoxaemia. 4. Endotoxaemia for 360 min resulted in rises in the serum levels of urea and creatinine (indicators of renal failure), glutamate-oxalate-transferase (GOT) and glutamate-pyruvate-transferase (GPT) (indicators of hepatocellular injury), and bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transferase (gamma GT) (indicators of liver failure) as well as nitrite (indicator of the induction of nitric oxide synthase; iNOS). Treatment of LPS-rats with BQ-788, but not with BQ-485, attenuated the degree of liver injury and failure, while neither BQ-788 nor BQ-485 affected the acute renal failure or the induction of iNOS caused by endotoxin. 5. Endotoxaemia also caused (within 15 min) an acute metabolic acidosis (falls in pH, HCO3-and base excess) which was compensated by hyperventilation (fall in PaCO2). Treatment of LPS-rats with BQ-788 or BQ-485 did not affect the metabolic acidosis caused by LPS. 6. Thus, the selective ETB receptor antagonist BQ-788 attenuated (i) the delayed hypotension, (ii) the vascular hyporeactivity to NA as well as (iii) the degree of hepatocellular injury and dysfunction caused by endotoxin in the anaesthetized rat. In contrast, the selective ETA receptor antagonist did neither attenuate the circulatory failure nor the liver or renal dysfunction associated with endotoxaemia. We propose that the prevention of the hepatocellular dysfunction and injury caused BQ-788 in endotoxaemia is due to an improvement in oxygen delivery to the liver secondary to (i) inhibition of pre-sinusoidal constriction, (ii) inhibition of sinusoidal constriction, and (iii) improvement in perfusion pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.