ArticleArchives of virology1996
The characterization of VP7 (G type) and VP4 (P type) genes of bovine group A rotaviruses from field samples using RT-PCR and RFLP analysis.
Article in Archives of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Quadruplex Real-Time TaqManViruses · 2023Article
- G and P genotype profiles of rotavirus a field strains circulating in a vaccinated bovine farm as parameters for assessing biosecurity level.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2022Article
- Cross-sectional study and genotyping of rotavirus-A infections in ruminants in Kuwait.BMC veterinary research · 2021Article
- Article
- Rotavirus in Calves and Its Zoonotic Importance.Veterinary medicine international · 2021Review
- Genetic and phylogenetic analyses of the first GIII.2 bovine norovirus in China.BMC veterinary research · 2019Article
- Development and evaluation of a one-step multiplex real-time TaqManVirology journal · 2019Article
- Different virulence of porcine and porcine-like bovine rotavirus strains with genetically nearly identical genomes in piglets and calves.Veterinary research · 2013Article
- Detection and full genomic analysis of G6P[9] human rotavirus in Japan.Virus genes · 2011Article
- Ovine rotavirus strain LLR-85-based bovine rotavirus candidate vaccines: construction, characterization and immunogenicity evaluation.Veterinary microbiology · 2010Article
- Detection and genotyping of Korean porcine rotaviruses.Veterinary microbiology · 2010Article
- A longitudinal cohort study in calves evaluated for rotavirus infections from 1 to 12 months of age by sequential serological assays.Archives of virology · 2009Article
- Molecular epidemiology of bovine noroviruses in South Korea.Veterinary microbiology · 2007Article
- Molecular characterization of novel G5 bovine rotavirus strains.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Detection and characterization of bovine coronaviruses in fecal specimens of adult cattle with diarrhea during the warmer seasons.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2006Article
- Self-assembly of the recombinant capsid protein of a bovine norovirus (BoNV) into virus-like particles and evaluation of cross-reactivity of BoNV with human noroviruses.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2005Article
- Close relationship between G8-serotype bovine and human rotaviruses isolated in Nigeria.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Genetic characterization of a novel, naturally occurring recombinant human G6P[6] rotavirus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Application of restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of VP7-encoding genes: fine comparison of Irish and global rotavirus isolates.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterization of the VP7 (G type) and VP4 (P type) genes of bovine group A rotaviruses (BRV) from field samples was performed using RT-PCR and RFLP analysis. After RT-PCR amplification of the full length VP7 genes and partial length VP4 genes (nucleotides 1 to 1096), four enzymes, EcoRV, NlaIV, BamHI and HpaII were used for digestion analysis. For VP7, four RFLP profiles were observed after analysis of the digests: they were designated as G6, G6s (subtype, showed about 86% nucleotide and 90% amino acid identity to reference G6 strains), G8 and G10. For VP4, three RFLP profiles were observed: designated as P[1], P[5] and P[11]. The G typing analysis of 86 BRV fecal samples from 5 states, representing at least 11 different herds revealed that 60.5% (52/86) were G6, which included G6s (9/52); 19.8% (17/86) were G10; 7% (6/86) were G8; 10.4% (9/86) were G6 and G10 mixtures including two G6s samples; and 2.3% (2/86) were G6 and G6s mixtures. The P typing analysis of the same 86 fecal samples revealed that 64% (55/86) were P[5]; 28% (24/86) were P[11]; 1.2% (1/86) were P[1] and 6 samples (7%) were mixtures of either P[11] or P[5]. When the same samples were analyzed according to G and P type specificity, all possible combinations of G and P types existed in the field. The G6P[5] type was most prevalent and accounted for 46.7% (41/86) of the samples; 12.8% (11/86) were G10P[11]; 7% (6/86) were G10P[5] and an equal number were G6sP[11]. The G6P[11] (n = 2), G8P[1] (n = 1), G8P[5] (n = 1) and G8P[11] (n = 3) combinations were also observed. The following mixed BRV infections were observed in the field samples; G6sP[5 + 11] (n = 1), G8P[5 + 11] (n = 1), G6 + G10P[5] (n = 1) G6 + G10P[5 + 11] (n = 2), G6 + G6sP[11] (n = 1), G6 + G6sP[1 + 11] (n = 1), G6s + G10P[11] (n = 1) and G6s + G10P[5 + 11] (n = 1). Information on the G and P types and G/P combinations in the field samples should be useful for understanding the epidemiology of BRV and designing vaccination strategies to control BRV in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8893794What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.