Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8892931›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology1996

Redistribution of the delta antigens in cells replicating the genome of hepatitis delta virus.

V V Bichko, J M Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hepatitis D Virus Replication.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V V BichkoFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111-2497, USA.
J M Taylor
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
STRUCTURE AND REPLICATION OF HEPATITIS DELTA VIRUSR01AI026522 · NIAID · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI TAYLOR, JOHN MARSTON · 1988 to 2009
$5.1M
DELTA VIRUS--DELIVERY VECTOR/BIOLOGICALLY ACTIVE RNA'SU01AI031927 · NIAID · INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI TAYLOR, JOHN MARSTON · 1991 to 1994
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-06927NIAID NIH HHS AI-26522NIAID NIH HHS AI-31927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the small form of the delta antigen (deltaAg-S) was expressed from a cDNA expression plasmid and subsequently detected by immunofluorescence, it was found localized to the nucleoli. However, if the cDNA was cotransfected with a cDNA expressing a mutated hepatitis delta virus (HDV) genome that could only replicate by using the deltaAg-S provided by the first plasmid, then most of the deltaAg-S was redistributed to the nucleoplasm, largely to specific discrete nucleoplasmic sites or speckles; this pattern was stable for at least 50 days after transfection. These speckles coincided with those detected with an antibody to SC35, an essential non-small nuclear ribonucleoprotein splicing factor. Others have shown that SC35 speckles correspond to active sites of DNA-directed transcription by RNA polymerase II and also of RNA processing. We also found, in contrast to the cotransfections with the mutant HDV and the deltaAg-S provided in trans, that cells transfected with wild-type HDV showed a variable pattern of staining. The SC35-like speckle pattern of accumulation of delta antigen deltaAg was maintained for only 6 days, after which the pattern began to change. By 18 days posttransfection, a variety of different deltaAg staining patterns were observed. This pattern of change occurs at a time when the large form of the delta antigen deltaAg-L appears and HDV RNA synthesis begins to shut down. Our studies therefore support the interpretation that HDV RNA and deltaAg-S accumulate at SC35 speckle sites in the nucleoplasm. We speculate that these may be the sites at which HDV RNA is transcribed by RNA polymerase II and/or sites of HDV RNA processing. Furthermore, when deltaAg-L, as well as other mutant deltaAg accumulate, the speckle association is disrupted, thereby stopping HDV RNA replication.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsHepatitis AntigensHepatitis delta AntigensHepatitis Delta VirusHumansMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesisRabbitsTumor Cells, CulturedVirus ReplicationHepatitis AntigensHepatitis delta Antigenshepatitis delta virus large antigen

Identifiers

PMID8892931
PMCPMC190880
OpenAlexW1656204388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.