ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)1996
Colorectal neoplasms detected colonoscopically in at-risk members of colorectal cancer families stratified by the demonstration of DNA microsatellite instability.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lessons from Lynch syndrome: a tumor biology-based approach to familial colorectal cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2010Review
- Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer: the rise and fall of a confusing term.World journal of gastroenterology · 2006Review
- Article
- Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2005Article
- Article
- Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability.The American journal of pathology · 2001Article
- Inherited colon cancer as an example of a multistep process model.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared colonoscopic findings in families meeting the Amsterdam criteria (A) for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) but stratified according to whether the familial cancers showed DNA microsatellite instability. DNA was extracted from paired samples of normal and cancer, and microsatellite instability was analysed at up to six loci. Families were termed replication error positive (RER+) when at least 50% of tumours tested per family were positive. Of 26 families studied 17 were RER+ and 9 were RER-. Cancers in the A/RER- families showed no right-sided predilection (P < 0.001). Colonoscopies have been performed on 182 at-risk members of A/RER+ families and 60 members of A/RER- families. More of the at-risk members of A/RER-families were found to have adenomas at colonoscopy (P = 0.095), but these were smaller than those of A/RER+ families (P = 0.19). The adenoma:carcinoma ratio was twice as high in A/RER- families (13:1) as in A/RER+ families (7:1). One of the A/RER- families had hyperplastic polyposis. The others do not appear to have attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis and are similar to the adenoma families or late-onset colorectal cancer families described by others. This study illustrates the importance of molecular technology in separating HNPCC from syndromes with overlapping phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.