Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1996
The effect of training on cardiovascular responses to arm exercise in individuals with tetraplegia.
Trial report in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Health-enhancing physical activity interventions in non-ambulatory people with severe motor impairments - a scoping review.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Absence of cardiovascular drift during prolonged arm-crank exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury.Spinal cord · 2019Observational
- Assessment of Exercise Stroke Volume and Its Prediction From Oxygen Pulse in Paralympic Athletes With Locomotor Impairments: Cardiac Long-Term Adaptations Are Possible.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the physiological responses to maximal and submaximal arm-cranking exercise in 21 individuals with tetraplegia (TP) and to evaluate the effect of a 3 and 6-month training period (mean frequency of 1.5 h.week-1, mean intensity at 35% of the training time above 60% of the heart rate reserve) on these physiological responses. The TP were divided into 8 trained subjects (T), 7 untrained subjects (U) who started their training at the beginning of the study, and 6 sedentary subjects (S). All the subjects were tested at the beginning of training and after 6 months, whereas T and U were also tested in between, at 3 months. During maximal exercise, peak power output and peak oxygen uptake per kilogram bodymass were significantly higher in T (49.9 W and 14.2 ml.min-1.kg-1 respectively) compared to U (20.7 W and 8.8 ml.min-1.kg-1 respectively) and S (15.9 W and 7.4 ml.min-1.kg-1 respectively), whereas all other peak responses showed tendencies to be higher in T. This is most likely to have been the result of participation in sport and the effect of it on performance capacity in T, although differences in completeness of the lesion may have influenced the results. No significant differences were found for submaximal and maximal responses after 3 or 6 months of training in either T and U or in S. This may have been due on the one hand to the vulnerability of the subjects to diseases and injuries and on the other hand to the low frequency of training. On an individual basis, however, remarkable improvement was observed during the training period, especially for individuals in the U group. These results would suggest that a 3 or 6-month training period has no measurable positive effect on the fitness level of TP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.