ReviewDrugs1996
Recognition and optimum management of myocarditis.
Review in Drugs, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risks versus benefits of NSAIDs including aspirin in myocarditis: a review of the evidence from animal studies.Drug safety · 2003Pooled it
- Chinese Society of Cardiology guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of adult fulminant myocarditis.Science China. Life sciences · 2024Review
- Recombinant cardiac myosin fragment induces experimental autoimmune myocarditis via activation of Th1 and Th17 immunity.Autoimmunity · 2008Article
- Comparison of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and angiotensin II receptor blockade for the prevention of experimental autoimmune myocarditis.International journal of cardiology · 2008Article
- Diagnosis and management of viral myocarditis.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2007Article
- Acute myocarditis presenting as cardiac tamponade.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2004Article
- Influence of myocarditis on left ventricular function.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2000Review
- Innovative drug treatments for viral and autoimmune myocarditis.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 1998Review
- Cardiac troponin T: a marker in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis in children.Pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocarditis is a poorly understood condition and its prevalence is largely underestimated. A significant proportion of cases may be subclinical and chronic, leading to dilated cardiomyopathy, which represents the first cause of heart transplantation worldwide. Although inflammation of the myocardium can be associated with various causes, particularly viruses, myocarditis is usually idiopathic. Present evidence suggests that some 'idiopathic' and chronic 'postviral' myocarditis cases may be autoimmune, whereas others with acute self-limited disease or with persisting pathogenic virus by molecular methods may represent viral myocarditis. The major obstacle in identifying a specific therapy in myocarditis lies in the difficulty of a thorough clinical characterisation of individual patients in relation to viral and autoimmune involvement. This also explains the inconclusive results of trials of immunosuppressive drugs in myocarditis/dilated cardiomyopathy. Diagnosis is based upon endomyocardial biopsy. Management of myocarditis requires avoidance of agents that exacerbate myocarditis or depress myocardial function, and conventional therapy for heart failure (diuretics, ACE inhibitors and, if indicated, digoxin) and arrhythmias. Although at present the use of immunosuppressive therapy cannot be recommended on a routine basis, the recent Myocarditis Treatment Trial, where an aetiologically heterogeneous patient population was treated without significant adverse effects, provides some rationale for applying the same immunosuppression protocol to selected patients, e.g. those with active biopsy-proven myocarditis, unresponsive to conventional therapy, prior to transplantation, and those with idiopathic giant cell myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.