ArticleMolecular and cellular biology1996
In vivo footprinting and high-resolution methylation analysis of the mouse hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene 5' region on the active and inactive X chromosomes.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenomics in an extraterrestrial environment: organ-specific alteration of DNA methylation and gene expression elicited by spaceflight in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Normal histone modifications on the inactive X chromosome in ICF and Rett syndrome cells: implications for methyl-CpG binding proteins.BMC biology · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate potential mechanisms regulating the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) gene by X-chromosome inactivation, we performed in vivo footprinting and high-resolution DNA methylation analysis on the 5' region of the active and inactive mouse HPRT alleles and compared these results with those from the human HPRT gene. We found multiple footprinted sites on the active mouse HPRT allele and no footprints on the inactive allele. Comparison of the footprint patterns of the mouse and human HPRT genes demonstrated that the in vivo binding of regulatory proteins between these species is generally conserved but not identical. Detailed nucleotide sequence comparison of footprinted regions in the mouse and human genes revealed a novel 9-bp sequence associated with transcription factor binding near the transcription sites of both genes, suggesting the identification of a new conserved initiator element. Ligation-mediated PCR genomic sequencing showed that all CpG dinucleotides examined on the active allele are unmethylated, while the majority of CpGs on the inactive allele are methylated and interspersed with a few hypomethylated sites. This pattern of methylation on the inactive mouse allele is notably different from the unusual methylation pattern of the inactive human gene, which exhibited strong hypomethylation specifically at GC boxes. These studies, in conjunction with other genomic sequencing studies of X-linked genes, demonstrate that (i) the active alleles are essentially unmethylated, (ii) the inactive alleles are hypermethylated, and (iii) the high-resolution methylation patterns of the hypermethylated inactive alleles are not strictly conserved. There is no obvious correlation between the pattern of methylated sites on the inactive alleles and the pattern of binding sites for transcription factors on the active alleles. These results are discussed in relationship to potential mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by X-chromosome inactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.