ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
The functional investigation of a human adenocarcinoma cell line, stably transfected with the neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Control of signalling efficacy by palmitoylation of the rat Y1 receptor.British journal of pharmacology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
1. The human adenocarcinoma cell line, HT-29, has been stably transfected with the cDNA sequence for the rat neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y1 receptor, and three Y1 clones (Y1-4, Y1-7 and Y1-16) have been isolated which express high levels of specific [125I]-PYY binding. We have studied the functional responses or lack of responses to peptide YY (PYY) and its analogues in the three transfected clones and HT-29 wild type (wt) cells. 2. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) produced long-lasting increases in short-circuit current (SCC) in both HT-29 wt cells and the Y1 clones. VIP EC50 values were 8.4-11.7 nM in all four cases. The elevation in SCC after a maximal concentration of VIP (30 nM) was significantly greater in Y1-7 cells than in either HT-29 wt epithelia or the other Y1 cell lines. 3. PYY (100 nM) and human pancreatic polypeptide (hPP; 1 microM) were ineffective in HT-29 wt cells under either basal or stimulated conditions. In contrast, basolateral additions of PYY reduced both basal and VIP-stimulated SCC in all three Y1 clones. After VIP, the PYY EC50 values (in nM) were 18.6 in Y1-4, 8.0 in Y1-7 and 52.5 in Y1-16 hPP (1 microM) produced only small and transient responses in each transfected cell type. 4. The Y1 receptor agonist, [Leu31, Pro34] NPY (1 microM) was also effective in the three Y1 cell lines. In the Y1-7 clone the EC50 value for the effect of this peptide was 149 nM, 18.6 fold less potent than PYY. 5. PYY and the Y1-selective non-peptide antagonist, BIBP 3226 displaced [125I]-PYY binding from Y1-7 cell membranes with Ki values of 2.0 and 3.1 nM respectively. In the Y1-7 clone, BIBP 3226 fully inhibited the reductions in VIP-stimulated SCC induced by 30 nM PYY, with an IC50 of 27.2 nM and 30 nM BIBP 3226 caused a parallel rightward shift on the PYY concentration-response curve, with an approximate pKB of 8.0. 6. HT-29 clones stably expressing the Y1 receptor therefore show responses to PYY and its analogues that are characteristic of that subtype, and the Y1-7 clone in particular will be useful in the assessment of novel Y1-specific drugs. This approach will also allow the functional study of NPY Yi receptors with selected mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.