ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996
Characterization of endothelin receptor subtypes mediating Ca2+ mobilization and contractile response in rabbit iris dilator muscle.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications of cataract surgery in patients with BPH treated with alpha 1A-blockers.Central European journal of urology · 2011Review
- Alpha-blockers and intraoperative floppy iris syndrome: ophthalmic adverse events following cataract surgery.Current urology reports · 2010Article
- Eyeing endothelins: a cellular perspective.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2003Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
1. We investigated the characteristics of endothelin (ET)-induced contraction and changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) using the fura-2-loaded and non-loaded rabbit iris dilator. ET-1 and ET-2 (3-100 nM) and ET-3 (30-100 nM) caused contraction in a concentration-dependent fashion. 2. The selective ETB-receptor agonists, IRL1620 and sarafotoxin S6c produced only a small contraction or no contraction at a concentration of 1 microM. The rank order of potencies for the contraction (pD2 value) was ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3 >> sarafotoxin S6c = IRL1620. 3. The contractile response to ET-3 was antagonized by pretreatment with BQ-123 (10 nM), a selective ETA receptor antagonist. The contractile responses to ET-1 and ET-2 were antagonized by pretreatment with BQ-123 (10 microM), but not at a concentration of 10 nM. 4. ETs increased [Ca2+]i and sustained muscle contraction. ET-1 (100 nM), ET-2 (100 nM), and ET-3 (1 microM) induced an elevation of [Ca2+]i consisting of two components: first a rapid and transient elevation to reach a peak, followed by a second, sustained elevation; a sustained contraction was produced without a transient contraction. The ETB receptor-selective agonist, IRL1620 (1 microM) and sarafotoxin S6c (1 microM) also induced a rapid and transient elevation of [Ca2+]i to reach a peak and a sustained elevation, together with only a small contraction or no contraction. 5. ET-1 (100 nM) induced a transient increase in [Ca2+]i in a Ca(2+)-free, 2 mM EGTA-containing physiological saline solution (Ca(2+)-free PSS), and a small sustained contraction which was significantly different from that induced by ET-1 (100 nM) in normal PSS. The ET-1-induced increase in [Ca2+]i and sustained contraction were not affected by the voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker, nicardipine (10 microM). The ET-1-induced transient increase in [Ca2+]i was significantly reduced by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+)-ATPase inhibitor, cyclopiazonic acid (30 microM); however, the ET-1-induced sustained contraction was not affected by this agent. 6. The selective ETA receptor antagonist, BQ-123 (100 nM) reduced the ET-3 (100 nM)-induced contraction, but did not affect the transient increase or elevation of the second phase of [Ca2+]i. However, this antagonist at 1 microM did not affect the ET-1 (100 nM)- and ET-2 (100 nM)-induced elevation of [Ca2+]i and contractile response, or the IRL1620-induced elevation of [Ca2+]i. 7. The selective ETB receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (1 microM) reduced the transient increase in [Ca2+]i induced by ET-1 (30 nM), ET-2 (30 nM), ET-3 (100 nM) and IRL1620 (1 microM), but did not affect the sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i and contractile responses produced by ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3. 8. Pretreatment with IRL1620 (1 microM) reduced the increase in [Ca2+]i induced by IRL1620 (1 microM) and sarafotoxin S6c (1 microM), as well as the ET-1 (100 nM)-, ET-2 (100 nM)- and ET-3 (1 microM)-induced elevation of [Ca2+]i, whereas in the presence of IRL1620, ET-1-, ET-2- and ET-3-induced contractions were unaltered. 9. These results suggest that ETA and ETB receptor subtypes exist in the rabbit iris dilator muscle, and that the ETA receptor is divided into: (1) BQ-123-sensitive ETA subtypes activated by ET-1, ET-2 and ET-3, and (2) BQ-123-insensitive ETA subtypes activated by ET-1 and ET-2, which cause the sustained increase of [Ca2+]i and contraction; in contrast, ETB receptor subtypes are activated by ET-1, ET-2, ET-3, IRL1620 and sarafotoxin S6c and cause the transient and sustained increase in [Ca2+]i which is not able to contract the smooth muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.