ArticleJournal of clinical pathology1996
Central review of bone marrow biopsy specimens from patients with neuroblastoma.
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of three different methods to detect bone marrow involvement in patients with neuroblastoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- A pathologist's perspective on bone marrow aspiration and biopsy: I. Performing a bone marrow examination.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to achieve some uniformity in histological detection of bone marrow infiltration by neuroblastoma and to provide a measure of variation in histological opinions, sections from 712 evaluable trephine biopsy cores from children in a European Neuroblastoma Study Group (ENSG) study were reviewed centrally. Biopsy specimens were graded as tumour positive or negative. Discordance between local and central review opinions was found in 5% of specimens. Only five of 165 children at presentation and nine of 256 re-staging procedures in 126 children, affecting one child each, had their diagnosis upgraded to positive. In six re-staging procedures, affecting one child each, the diagnosis was downgraded. The low discordance rate is encouraging and substantially less important than previously documented difficulties in obtaining adequate specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.