Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8880572›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics1996

Prediction of psychological functioning one year after the predictive test for Huntington's disease and impact of the test result on reproductive decision making.

M Decruyenaere, G Evers-Kiebooms, A Boogaerts, J J Cassiman, T Cloostermans, K Demyttenaere, R Dom, J P Fryns, H Van den Berghe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2008
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of presymptomatic genetic testing for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long-term outcome of presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2009
    Article
  19. Perceptions of discrimination among persons who have undergone predictive testing for Huntington's disease.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2008
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M DecruyenaereCentre for Human Genetics, UZ Gasthuisberg, University of Leuven, Belgium.
G Evers-Kiebooms
A Boogaerts
J J Cassiman
T Cloostermans
K Demyttenaere
R Dom
J P Fryns
H Van den Berghe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For people at risk for Huntington's disease, the anxiety and uncertainty about the future may be very burdensome and may be an obstacle to personal decision making about important life issues, for example, procreation. For some at risk persons, this situation is the reason for requesting predictive DNA testing. The aim of this paper is two-fold. First, we want to evaluate whether knowing one's carrier status reduces anxiety and uncertainty and whether it facilitates decision making about procreation. Second, we endeavour to identify pretest predictors of psychological adaptation one year after the predictive test (psychometric evaluation of general anxiety, depression level, and ego strength). The impact of the predictive test result was assessed in 53 subjects tested, using pre- and post-test psychometric measurement and self-report data of follow up interviews. Mean anxiety and depression levels were significantly decreased one year after a good test result; there was no significant change in the case of a bad test result. The mean personality profile, including ego strength, remained unchanged one year after the test. The study further shows that the test result had a definite impact on reproductive decision making. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to select the best predictors of the subject's post-test reactions. The results indicate that a careful evaluation of pretest ego strength, depression level, and coping strategies may be helpful in predicting post-test reactions, independently of the carrier status. Test result (carrier/ non-carrier), gender, and age did not significantly contribute to the prediction. About one third of the variance of post-test anxiety and depression level and more than half of the variance of ego strength was explained, implying that other psychological or social aspects should also be taken into account when predicting individual post-test reactions.

Indexed as

ReproductionAdultAnxietyDepressionEgoFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansHuntington DiseaseMalePsychological TestsRegression AnalysisRisk AssessmentUncertaintyBelgiumEmpirical ApproachGenetics and Reproduction

Identifiers

PMID8880572
PMCPMC1050726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.