Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8880520›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1996

Multicentric epidemiological study of Aspergillus fumigatus isolates by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis.

E Rodriguez, T De Meeüs, M Mallie, F Renaud, F Symoens, P Mondon, M A Piens, B Lebeau, M A Viviani, R Grillot and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Studies in mycology · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Disease surveillance in recombining pathogens: multilocus genotypes identify sources of human Coccidioides infections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Epidemiology and Prevention of Invasive Aspergillosis.Current infectious disease reports · 2001
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Aspergillus fumigatus and aspergillosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 1999
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

E RodriguezLaboratoire d'Immunologie et Parasitologie, Faculté de Pharmacie, Montpellier, France.
T De Meeüs
M Mallie
F Renaud
F Symoens
P Mondon
M A Piens
B Lebeau
M A Viviani
R Grillot
N Nolard
F Chapuis
A M Tortorano
J M Bastide

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genotypes of 63 isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus obtained from three hospitals in different geographical areas and of eight culture collection strains were determined by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Twelve of the 17 enzymatic loci studied were polymorphic, giving rise to 48 different electrophoretic types. The existence of fixed multilocus genotypes, significant heterozygote deficits and excesses at the different loci, and linkage disequilibria within subpopulations strongly suggests a clonal reproduction mode for A. fumigatus. Numerical analysis of the comparison and disposition of the different electrophoretic types demonstrates a significant genetic differentiation between the three sampling sites. However, no correlation could be found between geographical distances and genetic differentiation. On account of the multiple discriminatory markers, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis typing seems to be a very powerful tool for epidemiological and reproductive mode studies of A. fumigatus.

Indexed as

AspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusElectrophoresisMycological Typing Techniques

Identifiers

PMID8880520
PMCPMC229318
OpenAlexW2137923840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.