Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8878579›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1996

Drug effects on intracellular mycobacteria determined by mass spectrometric analysis of the Na(+)-to-K+ ratios of individual bacterial organisms.

M Wiese, U Seydel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Insights intoFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M WieseResearch Center Borstel, Center for Medicine and Biosciences, Germany.
U Seydel
Research Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The successful establishment of a drug screening system for intracellular cultivable and noncultivable mycobacteria based on the mass spectrometric determination of bacterial viability is described. To compare drug efficacies on intra- and extracellular mycobacteria, the mycobacteria were subjected to drug treatment either after phagocytosis by the mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 or in cell-free medium. After reisolation, their viability was monitored by analyzing the intrabacterial sodium-to-potassium ratios for a limited number of individual organisms. This approach offers a reliable and quick tool for monitoring the influence of intracellular growth and of additional permeation barriers on intracellular drug efficacy and will thus provide useful information for the rational development and testing of optimized antimycobacterial drugs. In particular, the methodology is applicable to the noncultivable species Mycobacterium leprae, because the mass spectrometric analysis of the intrabacterial sodium-to-potassium ratio allows the determination of bacterial viability independent from their ability to multiply in vitro. Because of the improved metabolic activity of intracellularly growing M. leprae compared with that of extracellularly growing M. leprae, the spectrum of antileprosy drugs that can be tested in vitro could even be extended to those interfering with DNA replication and cell division.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntitubercular AgentsArmadillosCell LineDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLeprostatic AgentsMacrophagesMass SpectrometryMiceMycobacteriumMycobacterium lepraeMycobacterium tuberculosisPhagocytosisPotassiumSodiumAntitubercular AgentsLeprostatic AgentsPotassiumSodium

Identifiers

PMID8878579
PMCPMC163471
OpenAlexW2151672660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.