ArticleDiabetologia1996
Comparison of the effects of ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid and gamma-linolenic acid in the correction of neurovascular deficits in diabetic rats.
Article in Diabetologia, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Diabetic Neuropathy: A Point of no Return?The review of diabetic studies : RDS · 2006Article
- Differential metabolism of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid and arachidonic acid by cyclo-oxygenase-1 and cyclo-oxygenase-2: implications for cellular synthesis of prostaglandin E1 and prostaglandin E2.The Biochemical journal · 2002Article
- Vascular Impairment of Epineurial Arterioles of the Sciatic Nerve: Implications for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.The review of diabetic studies : RDSReview
- Associations of serum gamma-linolenic acid levels with erythema severity and anxiety/depression status in patients with rosacea.Anais brasileiros de dermatologiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Essential fatty acid metabolism is impaired by diabetes mellitus and gamma-linolenic acid rich treatments such as evening primrose oil correct deficits in nerve conduction and endoneurial blood flow in diabetic rats. Other mechanistically unrelated treatments, such as antioxidants and aldose reductase inhibitors have a similar effect and there may be positive interactions with multiple treatments. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of a novel essential fatty acid derivative, ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid, with that of gamma-linolenic acid in correcting diabetic neurovascular deficits. Eight weeks of diabetes caused 20.4 and 48.2% reductions in sciatic motor conduction velocity and nutritive endoneurial blood flow, respectively. Treatment was given for the last 2 weeks with gamma-linolenic acid (100 mg.kg-1.day-1) either in pure form or as ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid, an equivalent dose of ascorbate (21 mg.kg-1.day-1) or jointly with ascorbate and gamma-linolenic acid. Conduction velocity was corrected by 39.8, 87.4, 13.2 and 66.8% with gamma-linolenic acid, ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid, ascorbate and gamma-linolenic acid plus ascorbate, respectively. Corresponding ameliorations of the nutritive blood flow deficit were 44.0, 87.4, 87.4, 13.2 and 65.7%. For the gamma-linolenic acid plus ascorbate combinatin, and especially for ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid, the magnitude of correction for conduction velocity and blood flow was greater than expected for simple addition of ascorbate and gamma-linolenic acid, indicating a synergistic interaction. Thus, with an efficacy 40 times that of evening primrose oil in rats, ascorbyl gamma-linolenic acid may be a suitable candidate for clinical trials of diabetic neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.