Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8876234›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996

Synergistic up-regulation of the myeloid-specific promoter for the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor by AML1 and the t(8;21) fusion protein may contribute to leukemogenesis.

K L Rhoades, C J Hetherington, J D Rowley, S W Hiebert, G Nucifora, D G Tenen, D E Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Blood · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K L RhoadesDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
C J Hetherington
J D Rowley
S W Hiebert
G Nucifora
D G Tenen
D E Zhang
Harvard University Press · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Role of AML1-ETO in Acute LeukemiaR01CA064140 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HIEBERT, SCOTT W · 1994 to 2018
$5.7M
TARGETING STEM CELLS FOR GENE THERAPY IN LEUKEMIAF32CA068727 · NCI · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI RHOADES, KRISTINA L · 1995 to 1997
–
CD14 REGULATION BY MONOCYTE DIFFERENTIATION &CYTOKINESR29CA059589 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ZHANG, DONG-ER · 1994 to 1998
–
NCI NIH HHS CA1AI59589NCI NIH HHS CA64140NCI NIH HHS CA68727-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AML1 is involved in the (8;21) translocation, associated with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)-type M2, which results in the production of the AML1-ETO fusion protein: the amino-terminal 177 amino acids of AML1 and the carboxyl-terminal 575 amino acids of ETO. The mechanism by which AML1-ETO accomplishes leukemic transformation is unknown; however, AML1-ETO interferes with AML1 transactivation of such AML1 targets as the T-cell receptor beta enhancer and the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter. Herein, we explored the effect of AML1-ETO on regulation of a myeloid-specific AML1 target, the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor promoter. We found that AML1-ETO and AML1 work synergistically to transactivate the M-CSF receptor promoter, thus exhibiting a different activity than previously described. Truncation mutants within the ETO portion of AML1-ETO revealed the region of ETO necessary for the cooperativity between AML1 and AML1-ETO lies between amino acids 347 and 540. Endogenous M-CSF receptor expression was examined in Kasumi-1 cells, derived from a patient with AML-M2 t(8;21) and the promonocytic cell line U937. Kasumi-1 cells exhibited a significantly higher level of M-CSF receptor expression than U937 cells. Bone marrow from patients with AML-M2 t(8;21) also exhibited a higher level of expression of M-CSF receptor compared with normal controls. The upregulation of M-CSF receptor expression by AML1-ETO may contribute to the development of a leukemic state in these patients.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8Promoter Regions, GeneticTranslocation, GeneticAnimalsBone MarrowCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteOrgan SpecificityPolymerase Chain ReactionProto-Oncogene ProteinsCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorRUNX1 protein, humanRUNX1T1 protein, humanRUNX1 Translocation Partner 1 ProteinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID8876234
PMCPMC38155
OpenAlexW2074333479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.