Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8872702›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience1996

Investigation of the role of interneurons and their modulation by centrifugal fibers in a neural model of the olfactory bulb.

C Linster, R Gervais

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Early transformations in odor representation.Trends in neurosciences · 2010
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Bulbar acetylcholine enhances neural and perceptual odor discrimination.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C LinsterDept. of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA 02138, USA.
R Gervais

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Olfactory bulb processing results from the interaction of relay neurons with two main categories of interneurons which mediate inhibition in two distinct layers: periglomerular cells and granule cells. We present here a neural model of the mammalian olfactory bulb which allows to separately investigate the functional consequences of the two types of interneurons onto the relay neurons responsiveness to odors. The model, although built with simplified representations of neural elements generates various aspects of neural dynamics from the cellular to the populational level. We propose that the combined action of centrifugal control at two different layers of processing is complementary: reduction of the number of active relay neurons responding to a given odorant through increased activity of periglomerular cells, and an increase of response intensity of active mitral cells through decrease of granule cell inhibition.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAnimalsInterneuronsMembrane PotentialsOlfactory Bulb

Identifiers

PMID8872702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.