ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment1996
Technical approach for the study of the genetic evolution of breast cancer from paraffin-embedded tissue sections.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer and aneusomy 17: implications for carcinogenesis and therapeutic response.The Lancet. Oncology · 2009Review
- The role of microsatellite instability at chromosome 11p15.5 in the progression of breast ductal carcinoma.Journal of Korean medical science · 2004Article
- Allelic imbalance at chromosome 17p13.3 (YNZ22) in breast cancer is independent of p53 mutation or p53 overexpression and is associated with poor prognosis at medium-term follow-up.British journal of cancer · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We have optimized a technique that allows the study of numerous chromosomal loci (n = 20-50) from single paraffin-embedded tissue sections by microsatellite length polymorphism analysis. DNA samples from normal and breast cancerous tissue can be obtained from the same section by means of microdissection. This technique was further improved by subjecting DNA to several cycles of amplification with a degenerate (universal) primer and then with specific microsatellite primers. This amplified DNA was also used to screen for mutations in the p53 gene by means of PCR-SSCP. In addition adjacent tissue sections were used to assess specific chromosome copy number by interphase cytogenetic analyses (chromosome in situ hybridization) and to analyze expression of specific genes such as p53 and ERBB2. As an example of the use of our approach we performed a detailed chromosome 17 allelotypic analysis in 22 breast tumors (5 ductal carcinomas in situ, 13 invasive ductal carcinomas, and 4 invasive lobular carcinomas). We detected mutations in the p53 gene by PCR-SSCP in 36% of the samples. Samples with significant levels of p53 protein accumulation detected by immunohistochemistry were also positive for mobility shifts in the SSCP analysis. We observed that chromosome 17 allelic losses and imbalance occurred at as early a stage as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Although in some cases we observed allelic losses or imbalance affecting the 17p13 region, close to the p53 locus, several of the tumors showed dissociation between such loss or imbalance and p53 mutation. Lobular carcinomas were predominantly disomic for chromosome 17 in contrast with ductal tumors, which often showed polysomy for chromosome 17. This comprehensive approach correlating the tumor subtype, its allelotype, with specific chromosome copy number and specific gene mutations and expression in preinvasive or early invasive breast cancer lesions will potentially provide information of relevance for a better understanding of the multistep mechanisms of breast carcinogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.