Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8866649›Full record

ArticleThe Histochemical journal1996

Immunohistochemical localization and quantitative analysis of cellular glutathione peroxidase in foetal and neonatal rat tissues: fluorescence microscopy image analysis.

K Asayama, K Dobashi, Y Kawada, T Nakane, A Kawaoi, S Nakazawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Histochemical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K AsayamaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yamanashi Medical University, Japan.
K Dobashi
Y Kawada
T Nakane
A Kawaoi
S Nakazawa
University of Yamanashi · JPUniversity of Yamanashi Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To quantitate the developmental changes in selenium-dependent cellular glutathione peroxidase during the perinatal period, tissue sections from foetal (day 12 to day 22) and neonatal (day 6) rats were stained immunohistochemically using specific polyclonal antiserum. The intensity of the staining was quantified by fluorescence microscopy image analysis. There was a general trend of enriched glutathione peroxidase in the epithelial linings and metabolically active sites. Significant fluorescence was detected in cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes, renal tubular epithelium, bronchiolar epithelium and intestinal epithelium at day 15. The intensity increased in a stepwise manner thereafter. The overall increase in the intensity of staining in the heart, liver, kidneys, lungs and intestine was 1.5-, 2.3-, 1.6-, 1.7- and 3.0-fold, respectively. The phase of most rapid increase occurred during the foetal period in the liver, intestine and heart. In the kidneys and lungs, glutathione peroxidase increased significantly during foetal life, and to a similar extent postnatally. These results suggest that the intracellular H2O2-scavenging system develops during the foetal period as an essential mechanism for living under atmospheric oxygen conditions. The late development observed in the kidneys and lungs is consistent with the relative biological immaturity of these organs in full-term neonates.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBronchiEpithelial CellsEpitheliumFemaleGlutathione PeroxidaseHeartHydrogen PeroxideImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImmunohistochemistryIntestinesKidney TubulesLiverMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceGlutathione PeroxidaseHydrogen Peroxide

Identifiers

PMID8866649
OpenAlexW2034065223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.