Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8864526›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1996

Investigation of the contributions of nitric oxide and prostaglandins to the actions of endothelins and sarafotoxin 6c in rat isolated perfused lungs.

H Lal, B Woodward, K I Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H LalPharmacology group, School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath.
B Woodward
K I Williams
University of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1. The aims of the study were to assess the contribution of prostaglandins and nitric oxide (NO) to the effects of endothelin (ETs) and sarafotoxin 6c (SX6c) in perfused rat lungs. This was carried out by using indomethacin, a cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor and NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG), a NO synthase inhibitor. Responses were studied under basal perfusion conditions and in other experiments after the elevation of vascular tone with the thromboxane-mimetic, U46619. The sub-types of ET receptors involved were characterized by use of ET receptor antagonists and cross-tachyphylaxis. 2. Pulmonary perfusion pressure (PPP), lung weight and pulmonary inflation pressure (PIP), were continuously recorded. Although L-NOARG (100 microM) did not alter basal parameters it markedly augmented the vasoconstriction and lung weight increases induced by ET-1 (50-400 pmol) or SX6C (25-200 pmol) while vasoconstrictor responses to phenylephrine were not affected by L-NOARG. 3. L-NOARG markedly potentiated the bronchoconstriction induced by ET-1 or SX6C whereas it had no effect on responses to carbachol. 4. When vascular tone was elevated, low doses (1.25-40 pmol) of ET-1, ET-3 and SX6C produced falls in PPP. The vasodilator potencies were SX6C > ET-1 = ET-3. The ETA receptor antagonist, BQ123, did not affect these depressor responses whereas the mixed ETA/ETB antagonist, bosentan, blocked them. 5. Indomethacin (10 microM) partially inhibited vasodilator response to ET-1, whereas it had no effect on SX6C-induced vasodilation. 6. L-NOARG plus indomethacin completely blocked ET-1 induced vasodilation, whereas responses to SX6C were blocked by L-NOARG alone. 7. Repeated injections of submaximal doses of ET-1 or SX6C caused tachyphylaxis to vasodilator responses. Subsequent injections of SX6C or ET-1 did not elicit depressor responses showing cross tachyphylaxis had occurred. 8. These findings indicate that under basal conditions the pulmonary vasoconstrictor, lung weight and bronchoconstrictor responses to ET-1 and SX6C are attenuated by evoked release of nitric oxide (NO). When vascular tone was elevated, lower doses of ETs and SX6C produced vasodilatation. These vasodilator responses are indirect, those to SX6C being mediated via NO production, whereas those to ET-1 involve both NO and prostanoid(s). Tachyphylaxis and ET antagonist experiments indicate that the same receptor subtype is involved in mediating the vasodilatation and that this is of the ETB type located on the endothelium. However the post-receptor vasodilator events triggered by ET-1 or SX6C appear to be different.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndothelin-1LungMaleNitric OxideProstaglandinsRatsRats, WistarRespiratory Function TestsVasoconstrictor AgentsViper VenomsEndothelin-1Nitric OxideProstaglandinssarafotoxins s6Vasoconstrictor AgentsViper Venoms

Identifiers

PMID8864526
PMCPMC1909892
OpenAlexW2092554998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.