ReviewJournal of medical genetics1996
Rett syndrome.
Review in Journal of medical genetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of a specialist Rett syndrome clinic from 2003 to the COVID pandemic: clinic experience and carer perspectives.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Rett Syndrome: Reaching for Clinical Trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2015Review
- Loss of predominant Shank3 isoforms results in hippocampus-dependent impairments in behavior and synaptic transmission.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013Article
- Rett syndrome and the MECP2 gene.Journal of medical genetics · 2001Review
- Novel mitochondrial 16S rRNA polymorphism in a girl with Rett syndrome.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 1999Article
- Prolonged QT interval in Rett syndrome.Archives of disease in childhood · 1999Article
- Linkage analysis in Rett syndrome families suggests that there may be a critical region at Xq28.Journal of medical genetics · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.