ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology1996
Effect of long-term intense swimming training on the upper body peak oxygen uptake of prepubertal girls.
Article in European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic Physiological Effects of Swim Training Interventions in Non-Elite Swimmers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Pooled it
- Longitudinal investigation of training status and cardiopulmonary responses in pre- and early-pubertal children.European journal of applied physiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present investigation was to determine the effect of a long-term intense swimming programme on the aerobic potential of prepubertal girls. Five girls [GS, aged 9.3 (SD 0.5) years] participated in a 40-month intense training period. The girls trained on average 10-12 h*week(-1), approximately 1 h-1.5 h twice a day, 5 days each week. Nine girls [CG aged 9.3 (SD 0.4) years] who were engaged in various activities (on average 1-4 h*week(-1)), but not in sports involving upper body muscle mass, served as the control group. All the children completed, on a special swim bench, an incremental maximal exercise prior to (pretest) and after (post-test) the swimming programme. Biometric parameters and the peak oxygen uptake (VO(2peak)) were determined using the same procedure at the pre- and post-test sessions. There was no significant difference between the two groups for any of the variables at the beginning of the study. The biometric characteristics remained similar at the post-test session, indicating that intense swimming training early in life has no influence on the physical growth of prepubertal children. The VO(2peak) expressed in absolute values, however, increased over a year in GS and CG by 38 percent and 13 percent, respectively. The improvement in CG VO(2peak) was related to normal growth and development while that of GS was much higher (P<0.01) than would have been expected due to growth factors alone. The reason for such an improvement could be attributed to an increase in the stroke volume and/or in the difference of the arteriovenous concentration of oxygen since the maximal O(2) pulse was different between CG and GS only at the post-test. Moreover, it increased after 10 months only in GS (delta maximal O(2) pulse: GS 1.09, P<0.01; CG 0.27 NS, ml.beat(-1)). Thus, the results of this study show that physiological adaptations can occur in prepubertal children as a consequence of intense physical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.