ReviewDrugs1996
Stavudine: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and clinical potential in HIV infection.
Review in Drugs, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of dosing guidelines for stavudine (2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine) in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2001Trial
- Antiretroviral drug use and the risk of falls in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Review
- The intra-S phase checkpoint directly regulates replication elongation to preserve the integrity of stalled replisomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Individualization of antiretroviral therapy--pharmacogenomic aspect.The Indian journal of medical research · 2015Review
- Association of Nevirapine Levels with Rash or Hepatotoxicity Among HIV-Infected Thai Women.The open AIDS journal · 2012Article
- A review of the pharmacokinetics of abacavir.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Review
- Stavudine once daily.Drugs · 2002Review
- Antiretroviral agents inhibit infection of human cells by porcine endogenous retroviruses.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Review
- Efficacy of antiretroviral agents against murine replication-competent retrovirus infection in human cells.Journal of virology · 1999Article
- Managing resistance to anti-HIV drugs: an important consideration for effective disease management.Drugs · 1999Review
- Antiretroviral therapy for patients with HIV disease.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1998Review
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of a single dose of stavudine (d4T) in patients with severe hepatic impairment.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stavudine is a nucleoside analogue which undergoes intracellular phosphorylation to its active metabolite, stavudine-5'-triphosphate. At clinically relevant concentrations, the active metabolite restricts HIV replication by inhibiting the inclusion of thymidine-5'-triphosphate into proviral DNA by HIV reverse transcriptase, and/or by causing DNA chain termination. Viral resistance to stavudine does not commonly develop during treatment. Where it has developed, up to a 12-fold increase in resistance has been observed in clinical isolates from patients treated with stavudine for long periods. Stavudine 40mg twice daily and zidovudine 200mg 3 times daily were compared in 822 patients at various stages of HIV infection who had previously received long term zidovudine therapy. Stavudine was superior for both primary and surrogate end-points including clinical progression, treatment failure, increase in CD4+ cell counts and bodyweight gain. In a larger study, stavudine 40mg twice daily provided greater benefit than stavudine 20mg twice daily in terms of weight gain, haematological findings and the number of hospitalisations in 11 784 patients intolerant of or resistant to, zidovudine and didanosine. Peripheral neuropathy is the major dose-limiting adverse event associated with stavudine therapy and occurred more frequently with stavudine than zidovudine. However, haematological adverse events were observed less frequently with stavudine than with zidovudine. Thus, stavudine is effective in alleviating signs and symptoms of HIV infection in patients intolerant of or no longer responding to, zidovudine or didanosine. It is also more effective than zidovudine in slowing disease progression in patients previously treated with zidovudine for long periods. The results of studies which will reveal the role of stavudine therapy in untreated patients and in combination with other anti-HIV agents are awaited with interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8861550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.