Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8861543›Full record

ReviewDrugs1996

Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines.

N I Cherny

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies in Support of the Role of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Dentistry.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Chronic Pain Management in the Elderly.Anesthesiology clinics · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

N I ChernyCancer Pain and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Shaare Zedek Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term 'opioid' is a generic term for naturally occurring, semisynthetic and synthetic drugs which combine with opioid receptors to produce physiological effects and which are stereospecifically antagonised by naloxone. For clinical purposes, opioids can be classified according to their receptor interactions (agonist, partial agonist, agonist-antagonist and antagonist), the pain intensity for which they are conventionally used (moderate or severe), and their half-life (short or long). Pure agonists conventionally used for moderate pain, short and long half-life pure agonists conventionally used for severe pain, mixed agonist-antagonists and partial agonist opioids are described in detail. The effective clinical use of opioid drugs requires familiarity with drug selection, routes of administration, dosage guidelines and potential adverse effects. Opioids are unequivocally indicated in the management of severe acute pain and moderate to severe pain associated with cancer. There is increasing acceptance of the role of opioids in the management of recurring acute pain, chronic nonmalignant pain of organic origin and severe neuropathic pain. The selection of opioids is influenced by pain intensity, pharmacokinetic and formulary considerations, previous adverse effects and the presence of coexisting disease. Some patients will require sequential trials of several different opioids before a drug which is effective and well tolerated is identified. Opioid agents should be administered by the most comfortable and convenient route that meets the specific needs of the patient. The regimen for opioid medications should generally provide around-the-clock analgesia with provision for rescue doses for the management of exacerbations of the pain not covered by the regular dosage. At all times, uncontrolled pain should be addressed by gradual increase in the opioid dose until either pain control is achieved or intolerable and unmanageable adverse effects supervene. The management of pain with opioid analgesics demands frequent patient assessment and a readiness to re-evaluate the therapeutic plan in the setting of either inadequate relief or adverse effects.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug PrescriptionsHumansPainAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID8861543
OpenAlexW2019282344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.