Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8855019›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1996

Chronic disease or physical disability? The role of the general practitioner.

D Memel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current issues in fitness for work certification.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002
    Article
  7. General practitioners miss disability and anxiety as well as depression in their patients with osteoarthritis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000
    Article
  8. Does the health status of chronically ill patients predict their judgements of the quality of general practice care?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 1997
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D MemelDepartment of Social Medicine, University of Bristol.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a lack of discussion and consensus as to what the role of the general practitioner should be in the care of patients with chronic diseases. Should general practitioners concentrate on the disease or should their remit include the resultant disability and handicap? General practitioners have tended to concentrate on the disease, but this may be inappropriate. For many disabled people, their general practitioner is their only source of health care and is the gatekeeper to other services. Greater knowledge among doctors of the functional and social aspects of disease would therefore improve the quality of care for patients, and should be assessed through clinical audit. Ways are described in which general practitioners, working together with their patients with chronic diseases and with other health professionals, can improve aspects of the care of these patients.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseFamily PracticePersons with DisabilitiesPhysician's RoleHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID8855019
PMCPMC1239542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.