Comparative genome organization of vertebrates. The First International Workshop on Comparative Genome Organization.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Karyotypic relationships among Equus grevyi, Equus burchelli and domestic horse defined using horse chromosome arm-specific probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
   Article
2. Characterizing the chromosomes of the Australian model marsupial Macropus eugenii (tammar wallaby).Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2005
   Article
3. An integrated 4249 marker FISH/RH map of the canine genome.BMC genomics · 2004
   Article
4. LineUp: statistical detection of chromosomal homology with application to plant comparative genomics.Genome research · 2003
   Article
5. A 1-Mb resolution radiation hybrid map of the canine genome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003
   Article
6. Four-hundred million years of conserved synteny of human Xp and Xq genes on three Tetraodon chromosomes.Genome research · 2002
   Article
7. A deer (subfamily Cervinae) genetic linkage map and the evolution of ruminant genomes.Genetics · 2002
   Article
8. Advanced integrated mouse YAC map including BAC framework.Genome research · 2001
   Article
9. Establishment of a high throughput EST sequencing system using poly(A) tail-removed cDNA libraries and determination of 36,000 bovine ESTs.Nucleic acids research · 2001
   Article
10. Automated construction of high-density comparative maps between rat, human, and mouse.Genome research · 2001
    Article
11. Anchored reference loci in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) for integrating pine genomics.Genetics · 2001
    Article
12. A radiation hybrid map of the cat genome: implications for comparative mapping.Genome research · 2000
    Article
13. Comparative organization of cattle chromosome 5 revealed by comparative mapping by annotation and sequence similarity and radiation hybrid mapping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
14. Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2000
    Article
15. Synteny and regional marker order assignment of 26 type I and microsatellite markers to the horse X- and Y-chromosomes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2000
    Article
16. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): expanding genetic and genomic resources for the laboratory mouse. The Mouse Genome Database Group.Nucleic acids research · 2000
    Article
17. A chromosome-based model for estimating the number of conserved segments between pairs of species from comparative genetic maps.Genetics · 2000
    Article
18. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome.Genome research · 2000
    Article
19. A comparative gene map of the horse (Equus caballus).Genome research · 1999
    Article
20. Interspecies comparative genome hybridization and interspecies representational difference analysis reveal gross DNA differences between humans and great apes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1998
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as