ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1996
Targeting hepatitis B therapy to the liver. Clinical pharmacokinetic considerations.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lipid-based drug carriers for prodrugs to enhance drug delivery.The AAPS journal · 2015Review
- Construction of a novel liver-targeting fusion interferon by incorporation of a Plasmodium region I-plus peptide.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- Carrier-mediated delivery of 9-(2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl)adenine to parenchymal liver cells: a novel therapeutic approach for hepatitis B.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2000Article
- Learning from biology: synthetic lipoproteins for drug delivery.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the world's most important chronic virus infection. The immunomodulator interferon-alpha (IFN alpha) is the only clinically applied drug available, despite its low response rate (approximately 30%) even in highly selected chronic carriers. Antiviral nucleoside analogues have proven to be potent inhibitors of viral replication in vitro, but their significant adverse effects which are, at least partially, due to their nonspecific body distribution, have forced the cessation of their clinical development in the past. For example, vidarabine causes severe neuromuscular toxicity, and fialuridine has caused fatal cases of liver and kidney failure in a recent clinical trial. Furthermore, the potential clinical application of (modified) antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, which are very specific inhibitors of viral replication, is hampered by their nonspecific body distribution, instability in serum and poor cell penetration. As infection and replication of HBV mainly occur in liver parenchymal cells, selective targeting of antiviral nucleoside analogues as well as antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to the liver would theoretically improve therapeutic efficacy. At present, conjugates of vidarabine and neoglycoproteins have entered clinical trials, and initial data suggest that therapeutic concentrations are achieved at lower dosages with minor adverse effects. These data have stimulated preclinical research on other liver-specific drug carriers for the selective delivery of HBV-active drugs such as glycosylated polymers and neolipoproteins: these approaches are outlined in this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.