ArticleInfection
Polymerase chain reaction control of antibiotic treatment in dermatoborreliosis.
Article in Infection. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutaneous Lyme borreliosis: Guideline of the German Dermatology Society.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2025Guideline
- Cutaneous Lyme borreliosis: Guideline of the German Dermatology Society.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2017Guideline
- Diagnosis of lyme borreliosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2005Review
- Diagnostic value of PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in clinical specimens from patients with erythema migrans and Lyme neuroborreliosis.Molecular diagnosis : a journal devoted to the understanding of human disease through the clinical application of molecular biology · 2000Article
- Diagnostic value of PCR for detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in skin biopsy and urine samples from patients with skin borreliosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1998Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of the efficacy of an antibiotic drug used in patients with various manifestations of dermatoborreliosis is crucial. Clinical judgement alone (resolution of the present dermatologic lesion, prevention of later major or minor sequelae) is not sufficient in erythema migrans and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. Thus, laboratory tests are desirable to prove the benefit of an antimicrobial agent. It was intended to establish a constant parameter--besides the clinical picture--for assessing the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in patients with dermatoborreliosis in terms of eradication of Borrelia burgdorferi from the site of infection. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was therefore performed from pretreatment biopsy specimens from lesional skin of 36 erythema migrans patients (m:f = 15:21, mean age 49 years) and seven acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans patients (m:f = 0:7, mean age 59 years), respectively. After antibiotic therapy with minocycline (100 mg, orally twice daily, 14 days) for erythema migrans, and ceftriaxone (2 g, intravenously once daily, 14 days) for acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans another punch biopsy was obtained and analysed by PCR. In pretreatment specimens, B. burgdorferi-specific DNA was amplified by PCR in 23/36 erythema migrans patients (69%), and in 5/7 acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans patients (71%). After antibiotic therapy, PCR yielded negative results in all of these cases. Clinically, all patients showed complete recovery or at least marked improvement of lesions at this time. PCR appears to be a reliable parameter for the assessment of the efficacy of antibiotic treatment in dermatoborreliosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.