Evidence map›Paper›PMID 8851572›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1996

Influence of maturation and growth on cefetamet pivoxil pharmacokinetics: rational dosing for infants.

W L Hayton, J Kneer, R de Groot, K Stoeckel

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W L HaytonCollege of Pharmacy, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1291, USA.
J Kneer
R de Groot
K Stoeckel
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous (i.v.) cefetamet and the bioavailability of oral cefetamet pivoxil in infants aged 3.5 to 17.3 months who were hospitalized for urological surgery were characterized. The absorption of cefetamet pivoxil administered in a syrup formulation was 38 +/- 19% (n = 5) for infants, which was comparable to values observed for children and adults. The plasma half-life of i.v. cefetamet was 3.03 +/- 0.96 h (mean +/- standard deviation; n = 20) in the infants. This was not different from the value observed for normal adult subjects but was longer than that reported for children aged 3 to 12 years. Urinary recovery of cefetamet after i.v. administration to infants was 63.4 +/- 17.7% (n = 16), which was less than the 80% recovery found in older children and adults. The steady-state volume of distribution was 399 +/- 116 ml/kg of body weight. It was comparable in size and showed the same dependence on body weight as it did in children and adults. The mean systemic clearance per kilogram of body weight in the infants was lower than that in children and adults, apparently because of immaturity of clearance processes. A model that accounted for maturation and growth with increasing age was developed for the clearance. On the basis of this model, the clearance capacity increased from birth to 5 years by a factor of 4.5 because of maturation. Maturation progressed exponentially, with a half-life of 14 months. This model was used to develop dosing regimen guidelines for pediatric patients aged 3.5 months and older.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgingBiological AvailabilityBody WeightCeftizoximeChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfusions, IntravenousMaleSurgical Wound Infectioncefetamet pivoxylCeftizoxime

Identifiers

PMID8851572
PMCPMC163159
OpenAlexW2166429943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.