ArticleJournal of the Royal College of Physicians of London
A view on NHS reforms.
Article in Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current 'reforms' of the NHS arose from concern over the increasing costs of health care; mistrust of the profession, including medicine and nursing; a contrasting excessive trust in the virtues of a managerial and mercantile culture; and possibly a desire to divert criticisms away from central government down to local agencies. The shape of the reforms largely reflected expedients which had been tried in the USA, with apparent neglect of the evidence that the system there had produced exceptionally costly and inequitable health care. With no prior evaluation in this country, and against much professional advice, the reforms were pushed through, and have caused problems. Massive managerial costs stemming from the artificial market have diverted resources, and also attention, from the care of patients. Doctors and nurses have tried to limit the damage, but limitation has its limits. To re-convert health care from a business to a service require abandoning the 'market', with its purchaser-provider split, and its imposition of a costly contractual framework on transactions which are in their nature clinical, not commercial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
8847692PMC5401211W2430429444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.