ReviewClinical rheumatology1995
Calcitonin for prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Review in Clinical rheumatology, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolonged calcitonin administration (intramuscular, subcutaneous, or intranasal) can prevent postmenopausal trabecular bone loss. Nasal administration constitutes a particularly attractive option for women who cannot tolerate or benefit from estrogen replacement therapy. The optimal schedule of administration still has to be precised, but 100 U/day of nasal calcitonin, combined with calcium supplements, can currently be recommended. Interrupted regimens are maybe favourable. Calcitonin can also prevent further bone loss in established osteoporosis particularly if bone turnover is increased. The anti-fracture efficacy of calcitonin is suggested by different types of studies but has not been formally demonstrated. Lastly, its analgesic efficacy in cases of painful vertebral compression fractures has been demonstrated in controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.